The short answer
Solar PV (photovoltaic) and solar thermal are different technologies that do different jobs. Solar PV panels convert sunlight directly into electricity, which can run your appliances, charge a battery or be exported to the grid for a Smart Export Guarantee payment. Solar thermal panels (or collectors) instead capture the sun's heat to warm water, which is stored in a hot-water cylinder for taps, showers and baths. PV is the far more common rooftop choice in the UK because electricity is so versatile and the panels are widely installed. Solar thermal only provides hot water and needs a compatible cylinder, so it suits homes with high hot-water demand. If you want one technology that does the most, solar PV is usually the answer.
Because both sit on the roof and both are called 'solar', the two are often confused. They work on entirely different principles and produce entirely different outputs — this page makes the distinction clear.
At a glance
- Solar PV producesElectricity
- Solar thermal producesHot water
- PV pairs withInverter, battery, grid export (SEG)
- Thermal pairs withHot-water cylinder
- More common in UK homesSolar PV
How each technology works
The two systems share a roof location but nothing else about how they operate:
- Solar PV uses semiconductor cells, usually silicon, to convert light into a flow of electrons — direct-current electricity. An inverter then converts that to the alternating current your home uses. The electricity can power appliances immediately, charge a battery, or flow to the grid.
- Solar thermal uses collectors — either flat plates or evacuated tubes — to absorb the sun's heat. A fluid circulates through the collector, picks up that heat and transfers it via a coil into a hot-water cylinder. There is no electricity involved in the output; the product is hot water.
This is the core distinction: PV makes electricity you can use for anything, while thermal makes hot water and nothing else. The hardware behind them, and what each connects to inside the home, is completely different.
The visible difference on the roof is smaller than you might expect — both look broadly like flat dark panels from the street, and evacuated-tube thermal collectors are the main giveaway, with their distinctive row of glass tubes. What sets them apart is entirely on the inside: a PV system runs cables down to an inverter and your consumer unit, whereas a thermal system runs insulated pipework carrying fluid down to a coil in your hot-water cylinder, driven by a small circulating pump. Knowing which you are looking at, or being quoted for, comes down to asking the simple question of whether the output is electricity or hot water.
The reason the two are so often muddled is partly historical and partly linguistic: both arrived on UK roofs as 'solar panels', and for a time solar thermal was the more familiar of the pair, before PV prices fell and electricity generation became the mainstream choice. Today, when most people say 'solar panels' they mean PV, but the older thermal systems are still out there and still being fitted, so the ambiguity persists. The practical consequence is that anyone researching solar should pin down which technology a guide, quote or installer is talking about, because almost every downstream question — cost, payback, export payments, battery compatibility — depends entirely on that first distinction.
What each one can power
Because electricity is so flexible, solar PV is the more versatile of the two. The electricity it generates can run lights, appliances, an immersion heater (so PV can heat water too, indirectly), an electric vehicle charger, or be stored in a battery. Any surplus can be exported to the grid and paid for under the Smart Export Guarantee.
Solar thermal is more specialised. It is efficient at the single job it does — heating water — and can supply a large share of a household's hot water over the year, more in summer than winter. But it cannot run appliances, charge a car or earn an export payment, and it needs a hot-water cylinder, so it does not suit homes with a combi boiler and no cylinder.
| Factor | Solar PV | Solar thermal |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Electricity | Hot water |
| Powers appliances? | Yes | No |
| Heats water? | Indirectly (via immersion) | Yes (directly) |
| Works with a battery? | Yes | No |
| Earns export payment (SEG)? | Yes | No |
| Needs a hot-water cylinder? | No | Yes |
Comparison for guidance only. Source: Energy Saving Trust.
Which suits a UK home?
For most UK households, solar PV is the more useful technology because electricity can be put to so many uses and surplus can be exported for payment. It is also the more widely installed, so installers, inverters and batteries for PV are easy to source.
Solar thermal makes most sense for homes with consistently high hot-water demand — a larger household, for example — and an existing or new hot-water cylinder to store the heat. Some homeowners weigh the two and conclude that PV with a solar diverter gives them most of the hot-water benefit of thermal while also generating electricity, which is why standalone solar thermal has become less common on UK rooftops than it once was. The decision ultimately rests on what you most want from your roof: electricity for the whole home, or dedicated hot water.
Roof space, efficiency and lifespan
A few practical points often decide between the two beyond their basic outputs. Roof space is shared: each technology needs its own area, so on a typical roof you usually choose one rather than both. Efficiency at the task differs in kind — solar thermal converts a high proportion of the sun's heat it captures into hot water, while PV converts a smaller share of light into electricity but produces a far more flexible output, so the two figures are not directly comparable.
On seasonal pattern, both produce most in summer and least in winter, following UK daylight and sun height. Solar thermal can supply a large share of summer hot water but contributes much less in the depths of winter, when a boiler or immersion makes up the difference; PV similarly generates strongly in summer and modestly in winter. In terms of lifespan and upkeep, both are durable roof technologies with no major moving parts on the collector or panel itself, though solar thermal systems include a pump and fluid that need occasional checks, and PV has an inverter that is typically replaced after around 10 to 15 years. None of this changes the headline: PV makes electricity for the whole home, thermal makes hot water, and most UK homeowners pick PV — increasingly with a diverter — for its versatility.
Frequently asked questions
Can solar PV heat my water like solar thermal does?
Yes, indirectly. A solar diverter (sometimes called a power diverter) sends surplus PV electricity to your immersion heater, warming the cylinder instead of exporting the power. This gives much of the hot-water benefit of solar thermal while the PV system also generates electricity for the rest of the home.
Is solar thermal still worth fitting in the UK?
It can be for homes with high, steady hot-water demand and a suitable cylinder, since it is efficient at that one task. But many homeowners now choose solar PV with a diverter instead, because PV is more versatile and can also earn export payments. Solar thermal has become less common on UK roofs as a result.
Can I have both PV and thermal on the same roof?
Yes, though roof space is the limit — each technology needs its own area of roof. In practice, fitting both is less common because a PV system with a diverter already covers electricity and much of the hot water. If you have ample roof space and very high hot-water demand, combining them is possible.
Sources & further reading
Figures on this page are typical UK ranges drawn from published sources and depend on your specific home. They are guidance, not a quotation or guaranteed saving.